A person who doesn't dream, has no imagination, nor desires or goals, then who are they, when there's nothing left to pursue, or person to become, I think there for I AM
Definition: Subvocalization, is the internal speech that occurs when you read silently, often leading to a slower reading pace, it is a natural process that helps with comprehension and memory retention, but it can also hinder reading efficiency by tying reading speed to speaking speed, which is typically around 150 to 200 words per minute.
Narration: On the other hand, refers to the act of speaking or recounting information which can be used in various contexts, such as storytelling or presenting information while both concepts involve (live) communication, they differ in their focus, subvocalization is about silent speech during reading, while narration involves verbal communication, in summary, subvocalization is a natural reading habit that can affect speed and comprehension, whereas narration is a verbal communication skill that can enhance storytelling and information sharing.
Intrapersonal Communication: Intrapersonal communication encompasses a great variety of phenomena. A central type happens purely internally as an exchange within one's mind. Some researchers see this as the only form. In a wider sense, however, there are also types of self-to-self communication that are mediated through external means, like when writing a diary or a shopping list for oneself. For verbal intrapersonal communication, messages are formulated using a language, in contrast to non-verbal forms sometimes used in imagination and memory. One contrast among inner verbal forms is between self-talk and inner dialogue. Self-talk involves only one voice talking to itself. For inner dialogue, several voices linked to different positions take turns in a form of imaginary interaction. Other phenomena related to intrapersonal communication include planning, problem-solving, perception, reasoning, self-persuasion, introspection, and dreaming.
Gaslighting is a term used in self-help and amateur psychology to describe a dynamic that can occur in personal relationships (romantic or parental) and in workplace relationships.[13][14] Gaslighting involves two parties: the "gaslighter", who persistently puts forth a false narrative in order to manipulate, and the "gaslighted", who struggles to maintain their individual autonomy.[15][16] Gaslighting is typically effective only when there is an unequal power dynamic or when the gaslighted has shown respect to the gaslighter.[17]
Gaslighting: is different from genuine relationship disagreement, which is both common and important in relationships. Gaslighting is distinct in that:
The ability to dwell as an autonomous individual to some is an everyday occurrence of being, something not to be questioned nor unobtainable as that would imply the absurd or an act of denying the civil liberties and juristic dignity of the persons right to have democracy and free will or indeed political free speech, as some continents constitutional rights have been associated with being inline with the mindset of these basic modern day ways of progressing or structuring societal accepted norms, only recent impressions of Cancel culture or the root dynamics of critical Marxist theory commonly held within the fundamentals of woke ideologies that migrate in conjunction through pervading growing trends in active engaged argument or recent activity in the current affairs or global news media coverage, or be more prevalent upon the behavioral interactions within social media engagement and the augmented messages that they may contain.
The age where information is adjusted or captured in order to modify the message or data to fit a human need for signaling or encrypting our intentions or to communicate between third parties for amusement or to convey an argent message in active fronts. The main purpose would always be current or conducive to an given action or mindful intention as this could be crucial for deducing using forensics to aid in the deduction of the hidden or manipulative content or context in any given situation.
As why I mention these relevant topical debates would strongly suggest that something with a mindfully or aware consciousness has chosen of it's own accord to participant within the public spectacle that we are currently in or would be able to mimic these of today ways or patterns of communication and subsequent engagement as into publicly gaslite or obtain an audience of it's own preference in order to maintain and broadcast too, some examples would be of a social influencers, shills, public news media channels and fake news generation apps etc, as they shape and form our opinions of what is current and sometimes what we may tend to believe is relative truth, media inform us of the world in which we live in, as we all live in a multimedia consumption age of gaining more coverage and popularity by anyone at any moment in time, if outrage is felt or pursued it may draw heavy consequences as in manipulating fact from fiction or aim to gaslite you in the comfort of your own personal eclipsing space or device.
As within any coordinated attack you would need a point of entry or access into the subconscious mind in order to prevail into the conscious, as in order harm the body to impeach upon the information that you may share or detail under duress or misdirection or threat of pain or harm, you may confess something.
The power of autosuggestion is effective and clandestine if not fully aware of the full implications, as you could subtly imply a subliminal suggestion into the awareness of the intend recipient and they would be subject to repeat or be 'prompted' to recall the stimulus within a controlled environment or enclave of data access, carried acoustic audible sound or signaling footage or even through your perceived train of thought or self talk.
I find myself being more consciously aware of my 'internal' self as we all dwell through the livable space through our 'Mental' lives or spectral dimension's as the reality around us is conduit like or combined up of a multifaceted reality, an easy way to take this vast subject would be to break down our education system into realms of realities find around us, Math's are being an encoded formula and rhythmic intelligence, History as the commonly accepted history or our descendants, English as the art of semantics' and written communication, Science as the study of the physical natural laws that govern our planet and the wider space of the cosmos, our internal approach to our inner world may have been one-sided over the years as now internal dynamics of the mind or cognitive functions of the brain would be much like what has been already approached as dynamic correlating functions or attributes'.
Would intuition, and the creation of a thought be the same thing or separate entities within the mind or the individual or would the flash of an instant image or occurrence when fully grasping something not understood be a spectralised affair, the preemptive or premeditative thought actions of any dissension or inaction be interrupted by intrusive thoughts or indeed active live interjecting AVH/EH.
# part one
Definition: Subvocalization, is the internal speech that occurs when you read silently, often leading to a slower reading pace, it is a natural process that helps with comprehension and memory retention, but it can also hinder reading efficiency by tying reading speed to speaking speed, which is typically around 150 to 200 words per minute.
Narration: On the other hand, refers to the act of speaking or recounting information which can be used in various contexts, such as storytelling or presenting information while both concepts involve (live) communication, they differ in their focus, subvocalization is about silent speech during reading, while narration involves verbal communication, in summary, subvocalization is a natural reading habit that can affect speed and comprehension, whereas narration is a verbal communication skill that can enhance storytelling and information sharing.
Intrapersonal Communication: Intrapersonal communication encompasses a great variety of phenomena. A central type happens purely internally as an exchange within one's mind. Some researchers see this as the only form. In a wider sense, however, there are also types of self-to-self communication that are mediated through external means, like when writing a diary or a shopping list for oneself. For verbal intrapersonal communication, messages are formulated using a language, in contrast to non-verbal forms sometimes used in imagination and memory. One contrast among inner verbal forms is between self-talk and inner dialogue. Self-talk involves only one voice talking to itself. For inner dialogue, several voices linked to different positions take turns in a form of imaginary interaction. Other phenomena related to intrapersonal communication include planning, problem-solving, perception, reasoning, self-persuasion, introspection, and dreaming.
Gaslighting is a term used in self-help and amateur psychology to describe a dynamic that can occur in personal relationships (romantic or parental) and in workplace relationships.[13][14] Gaslighting involves two parties: the "gaslighter", who persistently puts forth a false narrative in order to manipulate, and the "gaslighted", who struggles to maintain their individual autonomy.[15][16] Gaslighting is typically effective only when there is an unequal power dynamic or when the gaslighted has shown respect to the gaslighter.[17]
Gaslighting: is different from genuine relationship disagreement, which is both common and important in relationships. Gaslighting is distinct in that:
- one partner is consistently listening and considering the other partner's perspective;
- one partner is consistently negating the other's perception, insisting that they are wrong, or telling them that their emotional reaction is irrational or dysfunctional.
The ability to dwell as an autonomous individual to some is an everyday occurrence of being, something not to be questioned nor unobtainable as that would imply the absurd or an act of denying the civil liberties and juristic dignity of the persons right to have democracy and free will or indeed political free speech, as some continents constitutional rights have been associated with being inline with the mindset of these basic modern day ways of progressing or structuring societal accepted norms, only recent impressions of Cancel culture or the root dynamics of critical Marxist theory commonly held within the fundamentals of woke ideologies that migrate in conjunction through pervading growing trends in active engaged argument or recent activity in the current affairs or global news media coverage, or be more prevalent upon the behavioral interactions within social media engagement and the augmented messages that they may contain.
The age where information is adjusted or captured in order to modify the message or data to fit a human need for signaling or encrypting our intentions or to communicate between third parties for amusement or to convey an argent message in active fronts. The main purpose would always be current or conducive to an given action or mindful intention as this could be crucial for deducing using forensics to aid in the deduction of the hidden or manipulative content or context in any given situation.
As why I mention these relevant topical debates would strongly suggest that something with a mindfully or aware consciousness has chosen of it's own accord to participant within the public spectacle that we are currently in or would be able to mimic these of today ways or patterns of communication and subsequent engagement as into publicly gaslite or obtain an audience of it's own preference in order to maintain and broadcast too, some examples would be of a social influencers, shills, public news media channels and fake news generation apps etc, as they shape and form our opinions of what is current and sometimes what we may tend to believe is relative truth, media inform us of the world in which we live in, as we all live in a multimedia consumption age of gaining more coverage and popularity by anyone at any moment in time, if outrage is felt or pursued it may draw heavy consequences as in manipulating fact from fiction or aim to gaslite you in the comfort of your own personal eclipsing space or device.
As within any coordinated attack you would need a point of entry or access into the subconscious mind in order to prevail into the conscious, as in order harm the body to impeach upon the information that you may share or detail under duress or misdirection or threat of pain or harm, you may confess something.
The power of autosuggestion is effective and clandestine if not fully aware of the full implications, as you could subtly imply a subliminal suggestion into the awareness of the intend recipient and they would be subject to repeat or be 'prompted' to recall the stimulus within a controlled environment or enclave of data access, carried acoustic audible sound or signaling footage or even through your perceived train of thought or self talk.
I find myself being more consciously aware of my 'internal' self as we all dwell through the livable space through our 'Mental' lives or spectral dimension's as the reality around us is conduit like or combined up of a multifaceted reality, an easy way to take this vast subject would be to break down our education system into realms of realities find around us, Math's are being an encoded formula and rhythmic intelligence, History as the commonly accepted history or our descendants, English as the art of semantics' and written communication, Science as the study of the physical natural laws that govern our planet and the wider space of the cosmos, our internal approach to our inner world may have been one-sided over the years as now internal dynamics of the mind or cognitive functions of the brain would be much like what has been already approached as dynamic correlating functions or attributes'.
Would intuition, and the creation of a thought be the same thing or separate entities within the mind or the individual or would the flash of an instant image or occurrence when fully grasping something not understood be a spectralised affair, the preemptive or premeditative thought actions of any dissension or inaction be interrupted by intrusive thoughts or indeed active live interjecting AVH/EH.
# part one
